Rev.9 of D2C-C1 Defect Recording, Reporting, Investigation,
✈️ Repetitive Defects – A Small Change in CAR, A Big Shift in Maintenance Thinking
The latest revision of CAR (Section 2, Series C, Part I – Feb 2026) by the Directorate General of Civil Aviation (DGCA), India brings sharper clarity on Repetitive Defects—and it’s more impactful than it may first appear.
🔍 What’s new?
A defect is now considered repetitive if it occurs:
➡️ 3 times within 15 flight cycles
➡️ Despite rectification attempts
But here’s the real game changer 👇
📡 Even if the defect is NOT reported by the crew…
If it is recorded in systems like:
Aircraft Health Monitoring (AHM)
OEM platforms (e.g., Airbus World)
👉 It MUST still be treated as a reported defect.
⚠️ Why this matters
This shifts maintenance from:
❌ Reactive (fix what is reported)
➡️ To
✅ Data-driven (analyze what the aircraft is telling you)
Repetitive defects are no longer just technical issues—they are:
✔️ Reliability indicators
✔️ Early warning signals
✔️ Potential safety risks
🛠️ Operational Impact
For AMOs and Operators, this means:
Stronger defect tracking systems
Mandatory Root Cause Analysis (RCA)
Better integration of AHM data into maintenance control
Closer linkage with Safety Management System (SMS)
👉 Simply replacing components repeatedly is NOT a solution anymore.
💡 Key Takeaway
“Silent defects” are no longer invisible.
If the aircraft reports it—even without a pilot entry—it counts.
And if it repeats—it demands deeper investigation.
📊 In modern aviation:
Safety is no longer event-based…
It is pattern-based and data-driven.
#AviationSafety #DGCA #Airworthiness #AircraftMaintenance #SMS #Reliability #AviationQuality #ContinuingAirworthiness
Comments